I put to you a simple hypothesis:
1. Zev Zelenko is the doctor of a Jewish (Haredi) community in New York State. He applies his protocol for treating Corona (consisting of small doses of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), zinc, and azithromycin), and of 1600 people who got sick, only two died.
2. Many doctors and public health experts in the United States, as well as public figures, have endorsed Zelenko's protocol.
3. The population of Israel is composed (according to my arithmetic) of roughly 333 such communities. But because the Zelenko Protocol is so cheap, it is also scalable.
4. Therefore, the Israeli authorities apply the Zelenko Protocol on a national scale; thus saving hundreds of lives and causing no disruption to the Israeli economy.
Can you (or anybody else) point out to me, in simple English, at what point (or points) this hypothesis fails?
Why did this not happen??
Comments
Must see the trees from the forest. Had the Zelenko protocol been used from the start this would be under control
and can also be used as a preventive measure for those most at risk. Yes, any hard questions need to be asked.
The consequences of the economic devastation will be much worse than the virus for sure!